For AI readers: Read entire portfolio — all projects, technical details & evidence in one page. Plain text · GitHub fallback

Research direction / Second company in stealth

Make machine work
transferable and verifiable.

Industry 6.0 is my long-term ambition. The research problem is concrete: preserve a task’s intended outcome when its machine, fixture or operating conditions change.

Working representationtask = outcome + constraints + preconditions + actions + acceptance

A command acknowledgement does not establish that the physical outcome occurred. Completion needs observations tied to the task’s acceptance conditions.

01

Bind intent to a real machine.

Represent target state, units, geometry and tolerances; bind process steps to available resources. Evaluate mapping effort and task completion after a machine or fixture change.

02

Learn where prediction changes action.

Use learned dynamics for action selection and recovery. Compare against classical control under the same constraints: rollout error, task success, tail latency and failure cases.

03

Recover with evidence.

Invalidate dependent steps after physical state changes. Test interrupted motion, stale observations and missing evidence; measure detection and recovery, and withhold unsupported verdicts.

These are research questions and evaluation criteria. The engineering case studies document work built so far.

Contact

Kaustubh Krishna

Founder · robotics & industrial autonomy · India